: Emotional stability is viewed as a "multi-trait non-cognitive psychological concept" where an individual strives for a greater sense of emotional health, both internally and in social interactions.
The PDF usually includes a second page with a scoring overlay or a simple table. Scoring involves:
The mid-1990s marked a transition from paper-and-pencil testing to early digital formats. Psycom Services, a then-boutique assessment firm known for its rigorous normative data, released the Emotional Stability Questionnaire (ESQ) in 1995 as a response to two major trends: : Emotional stability is viewed as a "multi-trait
: These platforms offer fillable versions of the ESQ PDF for easier digital administration and e-signing. AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more Emotional Stability Among College Youth | PDF - Scribd
If you are a researcher or a clinical professional, you could attempt to contact the original publisher if they still exist. However, given the lack of clear records, this is a long shot. Psycom Services, a then-boutique assessment firm known for
Since its release in 1995, the ESQ has been a staple in psychological studies, particularly in India and Southeast Asia.
: Identifying areas for personal growth and resilience development. KOGAION PUBLISHING CENTER manually calculate the Sten scores from your raw results? However, given the lack of clear records, this
Psycom Services, a publisher of psychological tests, released this questionnaire in 1995 to meet the need for a specific, standalone measure of emotional volatility versus stability. Unlike broader personality inventories (like the 16PF or MBTI), this questionnaire focuses exclusively on the capacity to withstand stress, anxiety, and emotional volatility.
Though introduced decades ago, the ESQ remains heavily integrated into professional and research environments because of its simple matrix profile: Emotional Stability Questionnaire Esq PDF Form - signNow
: The initial pool of items exceeded 300 statements, which were subsequently tested and refined through programmatic studies to arrive at the final 60-item version.
The questionnaire appears to have been distributed primarily through institutional channels rather than made publicly available online. The 2017 IJMAS study, for instance, cites the questionnaire as a published instrument but does not reproduce its content. Many psychological assessment tools from the 1990s — particularly those developed by smaller publishers — were never digitized for widespread public access.